The Voting Members listed in the table below became part of the DataSHIELD community following the inauguration at the DataSHIELD Conference in Barcelona, October 2022. Themes indicated against each name represent preferences at the time of joining and may not represent ongoing committment.
Name |
Infrastructure development |
Operational management |
Statistical development |
Education |
Governance |
Communications |
Andrei Morgan |
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Angela Pinot de Moira |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Artur Rocha |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Becca Wilson |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Christian Hilbrands |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Demetris Avraam |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
Dick Postma |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Elaine Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
Eleanor Hyde |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
Erik Zwart |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
Florian Schwarz |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Gonçalo Gonçalves |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Hugh Garner |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Jan Hasenauer |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
José Luis Peñalvo |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
Juan Ramon Gonzalez |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
Manuel Huth |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Marije van der Geest |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
Mariska Slofstra |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Marta Filipa Pinto da Costa |
|
|
|
X |
X |
X |
Morris Swertz |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
Olly Butters |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
Stuart Wheater |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
Tim Cadman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Bishop |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Tommy de Boer |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Yannick Marcon |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
The following text is copied verbatim from the Constitution.
- Become a member of the community (i.e. become a participant in a Theme)
- Demonstrate good work ethic
- Get "sponsored" by one existing Voting Member
- Confirm agreement to membership principles / rules (see section in Roles) by posting publicly on the
forum or sending a publicly archived email
- Application reviewed by a Voting Member from a different Theme who doesn't work regularly with
Member applying to join the [Community Project]. The Voting Member who is reviewing the
application should be requested to do so by the original sponsoring Voting Member.
- If supported: Voting Member who is reviewing application recommends acceptance to the
relevant Core Group (go to point 6)
- If not supported, Voting Member who is reviewing application should advised applicant what
they need to do to be supported in future application. The applicant is permitted to reapply
after a delay of 3 months. There is no right of appeal but the sponsoring Voting Member may
choose to have a different Voting Member from the first time as a reviewer for the second (or
subsequent) application.
- Core Group approves application. If they do not approve the application, the Core Group must specify
reasons why not and what needs to be done for a new application. The Applicant is permitted to
reapply after a minimum delay of 3 months, once the conditions have been satisfied. They may
alternatively appeal this decision to the Steering Committee.
- Right of appeal (in case of rejection by the Core Group): the application is reviewed by the Steering
Committee.